Updates on Laurel: April 2005 |
| More or less as posted on the November '00 Playgroup on eboards4all or the "Over 35 and Hitting Our Stride" board on Network54 |
|
April 8, 2005 I spoke to the reproductive endocrinologist this morning at my ovary
check and he agreed that it was time to talk. Ovary check was fine BTW,
two small cysts but nothing show-stopping. Anyway, what was decided was
to start doing the testing that would be needed before I'd be accepted
into their IVF program, which includes the dreaded CCCT (clomiphene
citrate [Clomid] challenge test) and a saline infusion sonogram. So...Clomid
this month. Whee. Oh, that was SO much fun the three cycles I did it.
Not. No IUI. (I think after that 136 million thing the last cycle
they're kind of questioning the need!) Blood draw today, another next
Friday, and the sonogram on Tuesday. And then we will see. The CCCT
makes me nervous, I've seen so many women on the Over 40 board come back
with bad results on that. I'm in a funk, but I need to stop funking and
start getting ready for a meeting tonight (taking a break from the
babysitter interviews - which are wearing on me too - to make a
presentation to our Commission this evening. Not sure which is worse.
Although at least we had one good babysitter interview already, which
makes us feel better).
|
|
April 18, 2005
WOO-HOO, I passed the CCCT!!!!!! FSH was 9.9. The nurse's message said it was a squeaker (they wanted
under 10) but I swear the information sheet they gave me on the CCCT
said 12. Anyway, I PASSED! The saline infusion sonogram was OK too. I
think the only other test we have to do for the IVF program is a more
detailed SA - which we are getting too close to O time for me to be
willing to sacrifice now so we'll have to wait a few days for that.
|
|
April 19, 2005
I've been meaning to post an update but just haven't had time! We did
hire a babysitter last week, after a hairy little cliffhanger. I tried
to call our first choice Sunday around 5 PM. Well, it turned out that
she and her DH had gone out for a night on the town - I left a message
for her to call me back as soon as she got back, no matter the time.
Meanwhile, about 9 PM, my second choice called wondering why she hadn't
heard from us. I decided to be up-front with her and tell her that it
was because she was our second choice and I was waiting to hear from our
first choice. She was OK with that. So the first choice calls at 11 PM
and says she has been thinking about it and has realized that there
would be a lot of carrying involved and did we have anyone else we were
considering? We were really disappointed because we had thought she'd
done great with Laurel at the interview and she had stayed with the last
person she cared for for seven years (until they went into a nursing
home), but like Bob said, it was probably a bad idea to try to talk her
out of it because someone coming in with a lot of doubts would be more
likely not to stick it out. I really dithered on calling #2 at 11 PM but
couldn't stand it and did. She said she was still up, was excited to get
the job, and could start the next day. And so she did.
|
|
April 28, 2005
Taking deep breaths after walking out of Laurel's IEP meeting. We had an absolutely disastrous IEP (Individualized Education Plan,
sets the goals that Laurel will work on with her therapists for the next
school year) meeting today. To begin with, we got the draft IEP
yesterday - lots of time to read and digest, no? I read it over this
morning and was struck by the fact that virtually all of Laurel's oral
feeding goals had been removed. The only thing that was left was that
Laurel would use eye gaze to choose between foods. No more "Laurel
will drink 2 oz. of thickened liquid," "Laurel will eat 4 oz.
of puree," "Laurel will eat X amount of a meltable
solid," etc. In fact, I had noted and commented at our last
"team meeting" that most of the things on her IEP under speech
and language goals (which is where the feeding goals were) had not been
introduced this year, even though they had actually been introduced
toward the end of last school year. I KNOW that she was making progress
over the summer with thickened liquids, because the SLP (speech/language
pathologist) at the time (who had been Laurel's SLP since the early
intervention program) gave us a demonstration. Unfortunately, that SLP
quit in September to go to another job. The SLP who was hired in her
place shortly went on maternity leave; now that she's been back, I could
not be less impressed. She speaks so little at the meetings I'm not even
sure what her voice sounds like. The PT or the teacher usually end up
answering any questions we ask related to the SLP's goals. Unlike the
previous SLP, who genuinely believed in Laurel (when she started with
Laurel, she honestly believed in Laurel more than we did - I really have
to credit her and NACD as the two sources that helped us get our faith
back in our daughter), or even the PT who doesn't believe in Laurel but
at least gets passionate that she's comfortable and her range of motion
is OK, I feel like this one's simply occupying space.
|
|
April 29, 2005
Laurel's casts are off, and my evaluation went great! I can't say that our visit to the children's rehab center to get the
casts off was exactly joyful, given that it was over four hours long! It
took them 1 1/4 hours just to get to taking the casts off. Then she had
to be fit for her AFOs (ankle braces), and then it turned out that
although the doctor had talked to us about getting temporary, soft
plastic braces until the permanent ones are ready in several weeks, he
hadn't written the order for them! So he had to be tracked down, and
then we were hit with the news that our insurance might not pay for them
and they're several hundred dollars. At first we told them to find out,
but then we decided, well, if she needs them she needs them, so we said
never mind (especially as finding out seemed to be taking a while), just
do them. Well, the soft plastic has to be heated in hot water in order
to be molded and it takes the water over an hour to heat up! So they
told us to go eat lunch and come back. Turns out there's a cafeteria at
the clinic, we've been going there for 4 1/2 years and had no idea. Man,
that place is a maze. By the time we got done with lunch, I really had
to leave because the last thing I wanted to do was be late for my
evaluation! So Bob stuck it out. He said the temporary brace fitting was
awful, took over an hour and they didn't get home until 2:15. Poor kid
was STARVED - she was due for her tube-feeding at 11 AM. And the
cafeteria didn't have anything suitable to give her orally. She can
usually go for an hour or so past her feeding and it never occurred to
us that she'd be getting home later than noon! I talked to Bob a little
while ago and he says she's finally feeling better and very tired now (I
bet!). ! |
| Home |