Updates on Laurel (and other stuff): December 2007 |
| More or less as posted on the November '00 Playgroup or the "Over 35 and Hitting Our Stride" board on Network54 |
|
December 1, 2007 (10:59 AM)
We found out yesterday that September 2006 dossiers are out of the review room! So we have presumably passed muster as adoptive parents for a little girl from China and if we can just endure the loooong wait, we will get her. If only they weren't averaging referring one week's worth of dossiers per month, and there are 40 weeks between where they are now and us! Still hanging in there for now...it's good to know we've passed review, anyway.
|
|
December 1, 2007 (6:20 PM)
OK, tell me not to worry...I probably won't listen, but tell me
anyway.
|
|
December 6, 2007
Well, the answer back on the architectural review is worse than I had
imagined. Our agent is trying to work a couple of different angles, but
I think the bottom line is going to be that we can't afford to build on
this lot. Here's what they want:
|
|
December 7, 2007
Well, I think we may play the ADA card...as Bob points out, changing
the porch would make it much harder to get a ramp up to the front door.
And having a two-car garage would be pointless, because we couldn't get
Laurel out of the car and into the house unless we took up one of the
spaces with a ramp and parked the other car outside. We also suspect
that a good chunk of their objection to the "character" of the
house is that it's a ranch house, which is of course what it needs to be
for accessibility reasons. I'm going to contact my friends at the local
agency that handles ADA complaints and see what they think.
|
|
December 12, 2007
So, I guess the house thing is going to come down to whether or not
the guy is willing to compromise on our not building a garage. I
contacted the folks at the agency that deals with ADA issues and didn't
feel all that positive about their response - this is what the director
said:
|
|
December 17, 2007
No compromise on the house so far... Apparently the issue is that they think the footprint is too small,
so they don't care if we build a garage per se but we have to build a
garage-sized thing. But here's the ridiculous part - the footprint of
the bigger house of the two that have been built is only 200 sq ft more
and 3 feet wider! (Most of the 200 sq ft, as Bob put it, is that
"their rectangle is more filled in." And about 700 sq ft is
the garage.) Can you believe this?? Do they seriously think someone is
going to go out there with a tape measure? We have the builder working
on overlaying the house plans to demonstrate how ridiculous this is. I
also sent our real estate agent a bunch of links to studies that show
that even things like public housing and group homes don't lower the
price of neighboring houses - so it's damn unlikely that a slightly
smaller ranch house will. Are there really people out there like that?
"Ooh, Harold, I don't think we can buy that house. Did you see what
was down the street? There was a RANCH HOUSE!" If this weren't my
life, it would be funny.
|
|
December 20, 2007
We're on for a meeting with the lot owner at 2 PM tomorrow. Our real
estate agent said she definitely wants Laurel there, so we will need to
pull her out of school a bit early. I will talk to her about how
important the meeting is - when we have really, really stressed to her
that she needs to behave, she usually tries to (she is such a good
kid!). I'm relieved that we've gotten a meeting - their agent hadn't
been able to reach the owner and we were really worried that he had gone
for the holidays. Or had just decided the heck with us. The fact that he
is willing to drive up here from Richmond (which it turns out is where
he lives) indicates some willingness to listen to us, I think. So wish
us luck - I'll be sure to update tomorrow afternoon!
|
|
December 21, 2007 (4:02 PM)
Well, I'm back from the meeting but I still don't know... we did get them to concede on the garage. It turns out that the Architectural Review Board is three people consisting of the owner of the property, his younger relative who built the largest house in the development on spec and is building a second one, and the real estate agent. The sticking point, it turns out, is the younger relative. He spent a bunch of the meeting nitpicking the design of the roof over the porch (which of course looks the way it does because he insisted on the bigger porch) and the slope of the roof, but I thought that those were all we would have to deal with and it looked like we were winding down to an agreement for another review for those two items and the landscaping plan and pushing back the closing date when all of a sudden, he said, "Wally [that's the owner], you said when we started building these homes that you wanted homes in the range of $500,000 - $650,000. [Or maybe it was $550,000 - $700,000, I can't remember for sure.] Do we think that this home will sell for that much? Because you know, if we let in a house that is worth less, it'll drop the selling price of the other houses in the neighborhood." At which point, I'm afraid I exclaimed, "It will not!" And he says, "Oh, yes it will." And I said pretty angrily, "There are studies that show that you can even build a group home or a housing project and it won't affect the price of the neighboring houses!" but he shut me down, saying "Well, everyone has an opinion." So, now it's come to this: their realtor is running comps (that is, looking at comparable houses to see what they sold for), and our realtor is running comps. If it can be proven that our house is likely to be expensive enough, we're on to another round of review. If not, we're out. I feel like we're in some bad reality show. I think maybe the real estate agent is Paula (he really didn't seem to have any issues), the owner is Randy and the younger relative is Simon. The good news is that they're supposed to give us a decision by the end of the afternoon, so we will hopefully be out of limbo soon. I'm so aggravated, I'm not even sure if I care right now - since if we make it through this round, it means at least one more round with Mr. Personality. Who is not willing to let ANY detail wait till later - our builder tried to convince him that it might be easier to decide how the porch roof should look after the rest of the house was built, but no can do. Nor is he willing to concede that a landscape plan is virtually impossible to do if you can't see the topography. But, I guess it's still easier than waiting for another lot in the school district to come around...
|
|
December 21, 2007 (8:31 PM)
Bob called and said the realtor called him and they have not been
able to reach a decision yet. They're supposed to get back to us
tomorrow. Our realtor was only able to come up with one comp, it was for
$520,000 house + land. She tried to put some more sympathy thoughts in
their realtor's head, but I don't think it will matter - I think the
problem is the younger relative/builder, and he wouldn't know sympathy
if it laid its head on his lap.
|
|
December 22, 2007
So it got to be 8:30 PM today and still no word on the lot...and Bob and I just went with the feeling that had been building all day and I called and left a message for our realtor on her cell phone that we are walking away from the lot. Enough already, don't want to play Calvinball when only one player gets to make up any of the rules. We drove out to that other lot today, and you know, it's not bad. We don't love it quite as much as the other and it'll be a longer commute, but we've seen way worse - and at this point, not having to deal with Mr. I-Can't-Get-Over-Myself = priceless. So that's it - not settled the way we had thought we wanted (well, the way we WOULD have wanted if we were dealing with normal, reasonable people), but I think now it's for the best. Come the new year, we'll see what we can see about the other lot - when I reread the listing I saw that the acreage is supposed to be adjustable according to the desires of the purchaser (and is listed as five acres - what it is is a proposed subdivision of a larger lot), so it might possible to get a bit less acreage and pay the same or less as we would have paid for the other lot. But that's a question for later...right now, I just want to spend some part of my Christmas season not suffering from angst over a $#!%*!! lot.
|
|
December 31, 2007
Turned out not to matter that we decided to pull out of the lot,
because just a few hours before we left for Minnesota on Sunday, they
finally called to say that we were denied! "They're welcome to come
back with another plan," said the other real estate agent to ours.
"No, thanks," said ours sweetly. Honestly, by then I was just
relieved, since now it is all on them and they have to give our $1000
back with no argument. I figure on Wednesday we'll call our agent and
see if she's made any progress with learning about the other lot I
found.
|
| Home |